
1
00:00:00,720 --> 00:00:05,080
Hello and again welcome to the class. 
We're kind of a bit of the way in the 

2
00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:10,070
class and I figured, it's time to talk a 
little bit about how we do the peer 

3
00:00:10,070 --> 00:00:14,020
grading assignments. 
These are may be a little bit foreign to 

4
00:00:14,020 --> 00:00:21,567
you and because this is in early class, 
it's kind of a first year kind of college 

5
00:00:21,567 --> 00:00:26,050
class, I've decided to make all the 
writing assignments extra credit. 

6
00:00:26,050 --> 00:00:29,230
There's going to be three of them. 
They're going to be 10 points each. 

7
00:00:29,230 --> 00:00:33,070
all the points that you get on the 
writing assignments are going to be added 

8
00:00:33,070 --> 00:00:36,240
to your overall points, so they're, 
they're, extra credit. 

9
00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:40,660
So, even if you get 2 points, you're 
getting 2 extra points. 

10
00:00:40,660 --> 00:00:44,450
And they can, you know, if you do less 
than perfect on the quizzes, or less than 

11
00:00:44,450 --> 00:00:49,450
perfect on the final, these points can 
help make up without, with no cost to 

12
00:00:49,450 --> 00:00:52,570
you. 
So, they're kind of risk free. 

13
00:00:52,570 --> 00:00:57,080
So, you'll generally have about two weeks 
to write each of the essays. 

14
00:00:57,080 --> 00:00:59,785
I, I don't really mean for you to write 
them for two whole weeks. 

15
00:00:59,785 --> 00:01:03,640
I'll give you some time so I'll tell you 
what the questions are as you watch the 

16
00:01:03,640 --> 00:01:07,430
lectures maybe the ideas form. 
Some of you'll write them early, some of 

17
00:01:07,430 --> 00:01:09,505
you'll write them right the night before 
the deadline. 

18
00:01:09,505 --> 00:01:15,360
and and then after we sort of close the, 
the deadline and there's sort of no 

19
00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:17,540
slippage because then the grading has to 
start. 

20
00:01:17,540 --> 00:01:23,230
And so, you'll be assigned three to five 
other students assignments to grade. 

21
00:01:23,230 --> 00:01:27,735
And and that takes a week and then the 
grades are all collected together. 

22
00:01:27,735 --> 00:01:38,620
as you're writing if you're writing often 
in a regular classroom, you're writing to 

23
00:01:38,620 --> 00:01:42,735
impress the teacher. 
You're trying to show all the complex 

24
00:01:42,735 --> 00:01:49,170
wizardry that you have and you, you write 
as much complex stuff as you can to sort 

25
00:01:49,170 --> 00:01:56,294
of, you know, dazzle the teacher with 
your command of complex and intricate 

26
00:01:56,294 --> 00:02:00,260
theories and ideas That's not actually 
not what you're going to do here. 

27
00:02:00,260 --> 00:02:05,090
You're writing for your peers. 
these, fellow students have various 

28
00:02:05,090 --> 00:02:07,970
education levels as I'm going to show you 
in a second. 

29
00:02:07,970 --> 00:02:11,630
And you have to write to be understood, 
don't, don't show off. 

30
00:02:11,630 --> 00:02:16,900
You may be a genius. 
You may have a CISCO thing and you may 

31
00:02:16,900 --> 00:02:20,350
know net masks more than anybody, even 
way more than me. 

32
00:02:21,380 --> 00:02:28,020
Don't show off your super mask knowledge. 
Write to teach, write to explain, explain 

33
00:02:28,020 --> 00:02:32,090
to your fellow students, okay? 
So, and when you're doing the grading, 

34
00:02:32,090 --> 00:02:36,860
understand that this class is not a 
masters degree or a PhD class. 

35
00:02:36,860 --> 00:02:41,600
This is a freshman class. 
And don't have expectations of this class 

36
00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:45,100
that are like, you know, that they'll 
everyone in the class is going to write 

37
00:02:45,100 --> 00:02:47,490
at the same level that you're going to 
write. 

38
00:02:47,490 --> 00:02:50,420
So, I'll tell you, share you a little 
bit, wit, a little bit of demographic 

39
00:02:50,420 --> 00:02:54,180
data with you so you kind of get a sense 
of the make up of the class. 

40
00:02:55,260 --> 00:03:00,320
Over half of the students in this class 
are likely to be non-English speakers 

41
00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:02,960
right? 
So I'm, I'm an English speaker and I'm 

42
00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:07,280
lecturing in English but over half of the 
students are, in this class, that are non 

43
00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:10,980
English speakers. 
We're all just figuring this out. 

44
00:03:10,980 --> 00:03:17,000
We're all just kind of clunking along and 
learning as we go, and so treat each 

45
00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:19,560
other with some respect. 
We're all beginners, we're all just 

46
00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:23,820
figuring this out. 
we have a wide range of age. 

47
00:03:23,820 --> 00:03:28,000
Again, this data is from a previous one, 
a previous class that I taught. 

48
00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:35,620
and interestingly even though the class 
is kind of aimed at sort of 18 or 19 year 

49
00:03:35,620 --> 00:03:42,320
old student, there are very few students 
in the class, that are actually 18 or 19 

50
00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:45,961
years old. 
And many of the students are educated, 

51
00:03:45,961 --> 00:03:50,406
highly educated, andn then some of the 
students are coming back to school or 

52
00:03:50,406 --> 00:03:54,955
perhadps they, they they never finished 
their education for one reason or 

53
00:03:54,955 --> 00:03:56,970
another. 
So understand we have a very, very 

54
00:03:56,970 --> 00:04:00,330
diverse population. 
If we were teaching this class on a 

55
00:04:00,330 --> 00:04:04,200
campus, pretty much everybody in the room 
would be like, 19 years old. 

56
00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:07,950
But that's not the case here. 
So as we write for each other and we 

57
00:04:07,950 --> 00:04:11,010
grade each other's work, we have to be 
sensitive to that. 

58
00:04:12,370 --> 00:04:15,550
Here's another thing that you've gotta be 
really sensitive to. 

59
00:04:15,550 --> 00:04:18,320
So, this class is like a first year 
class. 

60
00:04:19,330 --> 00:04:23,590
Some where between the end of high school 
and college. 

61
00:04:23,590 --> 00:04:27,160
This is the typical education of someone 
in this class. 

62
00:04:28,970 --> 00:04:35,240
We have, so starting from here, high 
school, and then some college. 

63
00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:38,240
Right? 
So that's, that's sort of the [LAUGH] 

64
00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:42,590
this is the student the class is aimed 
at, someone who's finished high school 

65
00:04:42,590 --> 00:04:46,180
and is just starting college. 
We have some people that are late high 

66
00:04:46,180 --> 00:04:48,310
school, and that's okay. 
They're probably advanced students 

67
00:04:48,310 --> 00:04:51,600
anyway. 
Well, what's really important when we 

68
00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:57,790
start thinking about our grading is well 
over probably two thirds, or three 

69
00:04:57,790 --> 00:05:04,072
quarters have a bachelor's, a degree in 
one form or another, bacherlor's, 

70
00:05:04,072 --> 00:05:09,710
master's, even PhD people in this class. 
And so, the key thing is, this is great, 

71
00:05:09,710 --> 00:05:12,670
it's great to have so many really sharp 
people in this class. 

72
00:05:12,670 --> 00:05:17,830
They're going to be sophisticated writers 
but we have to be careful not to write 

73
00:05:17,830 --> 00:05:22,570
our essay for these kinds of people. 
We're going to write the essay. 

74
00:05:22,570 --> 00:05:28,102
And if you're really smart, then write a 
really good essay for a 19-year old 

75
00:05:28,102 --> 00:05:32,160
freshman to understand. 
Now when you're grading, don't grade as 

76
00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:36,100
if someone has a master's degree in 
Computer Science and mark them off 

77
00:05:36,100 --> 00:05:40,800
because they, somehow, didn't write at a 
master's in computer science level, even 

78
00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:44,110
if that's who you are. 
So, let's get to the point where we're 

79
00:05:44,110 --> 00:05:47,870
all on the same page. 
That this is a beginning freshman class 

80
00:05:47,870 --> 00:05:52,520
and even if you already have a PhD you 
should grade, and you don't have to be a 

81
00:05:52,520 --> 00:05:56,830
bad writer, but you should write for an 
audience that is a beginning audience. 

82
00:05:56,830 --> 00:06:01,840
Don't show how super awesome you are. 
Show how super awesome you are by writing 

83
00:06:01,840 --> 00:06:06,850
really clearly and writing to explain, 
writing to teach. 

84
00:06:08,090 --> 00:06:15,110
So, we definitely have less participation 
in the writing exercises for non-native 

85
00:06:15,110 --> 00:06:16,840
English speakers. 
And I think that's sad. 

86
00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:22,380
And so I go extra lengths to encourage 
non-English speakers to write. 

87
00:06:22,380 --> 00:06:26,440
Go ahead and write in your own language, 
translating it Google. 

88
00:06:26,440 --> 00:06:29,075
If you know some English, you can clean 
it up a little bit. 

89
00:06:29,075 --> 00:06:32,540
But even if you don't, just write it in 
your native language. 

90
00:06:32,540 --> 00:06:36,240
Answer the question in your native 
language, translate it, and just go ahead 

91
00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:39,600
and turn it in. 
Please add a little note to be just 

92
00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:43,950
really clear at the top of your writing 
to indicate your, that, that it's, what 

93
00:06:43,950 --> 00:06:47,820
your native language is and that this was 
translated by Google Translate or 

94
00:06:47,820 --> 00:06:51,820
whatever thing that you use. 
And I am instructing everyone when we 

95
00:06:51,820 --> 00:06:55,580
grade to ignore small grammar errors and 
read for content. 

96
00:06:55,580 --> 00:06:58,320
Let me give you kind of an example of how 
this works. 

97
00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:00,980
So here is a paragraph at the top that I 
wrote. 

98
00:07:00,980 --> 00:07:04,320
You know, I'm writing it for an article. 
It's in one of the, it should be in one 

99
00:07:04,320 --> 00:07:07,360
of the articles that will ultimately be 
in the class. 

100
00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:10,410
Come back, come back. 
Right? 

101
00:07:10,410 --> 00:07:13,670
And so here I'm writing with kind of 
flowery English. 

102
00:07:13,670 --> 00:07:16,940
In 1993, the connectivity is expanding 
around the world in many new 

103
00:07:16,940 --> 00:07:20,050
applications. 
Blah, blah, blah, quietly decommission 

104
00:07:20,050 --> 00:07:23,350
blah, blah, blah. 
So, you know, I write this. 

105
00:07:23,350 --> 00:07:25,910
I'm you know, I'd like to think I'm a 
pretty good writer. 

106
00:07:25,910 --> 00:07:30,550
And so I use sort of some active tense 
and passive tense. 

107
00:07:30,550 --> 00:07:35,540
And then what I did is I translated in 
like into Spanish and then back into 

108
00:07:35,540 --> 00:07:38,940
English. 
And, and so you'll see when it comes back 

109
00:07:38,940 --> 00:07:42,860
into English, as if I had been written in 
Spanish and then I translated it. 

110
00:07:42,860 --> 00:07:47,360
So first I say at the top, I say, you 
know what, I translated this from 

111
00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:52,390
Spanish, usually Google Translate. 
That's a signal to the graders to be even 

112
00:07:52,390 --> 00:07:56,770
more relaxed about small grammar things. 
Just ignore them. 

113
00:07:56,770 --> 00:08:00,390
So just, you know, you, you can see 
things here as, if you're a native 

114
00:08:00,390 --> 00:08:04,890
English speaker. 
You can see situations where, you know, 

115
00:08:04,890 --> 00:08:10,850
in, in 1993 NSFNet connectivity is 
expanding worldwide. 

116
00:08:10,850 --> 00:08:14,500
Well, okay, that's not very good grammar. 
You know, was is the right way to say 

117
00:08:14,500 --> 00:08:16,300
that. 
But it's okay, right? 

118
00:08:16,300 --> 00:08:19,920
So just ignore that. 
Think about what the writer's trying to 

119
00:08:19,920 --> 00:08:22,720
say. 
Because there's a translating device 

120
00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:29,460
that's in between us. 
you know, Gopher and Web come back, 

121
00:08:29,460 --> 00:08:31,870
Gopher and Web developed as distributed 
applications. 

122
00:08:31,870 --> 00:08:33,620
You might say, oh, what do you mean, they 
didn't develop? 

123
00:08:33,620 --> 00:08:36,000
Are they like a plant? 
No. 

124
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:39,430
Understand what the writer's trying to 
say and then, and then again, so you can 

125
00:08:39,430 --> 00:08:43,810
see, had been quietly decommissioned 
where I write my glorious English. 

126
00:08:43,810 --> 00:08:46,860
The translator says was decommissioned in 
silence February 28th. 

127
00:08:46,860 --> 00:08:52,170
But if you read and you read for content 
rather than read for syntax, you can kind 

128
00:08:52,170 --> 00:08:56,410
of understand what's being said. 
And so understand if you are reading, 

129
00:08:56,410 --> 00:09:00,370
somebody's writing that, that has been 
gone through translate. 

130
00:09:00,370 --> 00:09:05,580
These kinds of Little glitches in the, in 
the grammar are going to naturally be 

131
00:09:05,580 --> 00:09:08,020
introduced. 
And it, and so it could be written in a 

132
00:09:08,020 --> 00:09:11,500
very pretty way, who knows if I'm a 
pretty, my writing is pretty or not. 

133
00:09:11,500 --> 00:09:14,850
And then, because of the translate it 
sounds kind of clunky. 

134
00:09:14,850 --> 00:09:19,990
But just read past the clunkiness, okay? 
Just read with a smile on your face. 

135
00:09:19,990 --> 00:09:24,650
Read for content, don't read for, we're 
not, this is not an English class, this 

136
00:09:24,650 --> 00:09:26,972
is not a grammar class, this is a class 
about technology. 

137
00:09:26,972 --> 00:09:29,188
Okay, I think I've said enough about 
that. 

138
00:09:29,188 --> 00:09:33,460
Be kind. 
Plagiarism, plagiarism often comes up, 

139
00:09:33,460 --> 00:09:37,270
especially because we have lots of 
different cultures and plagiarism is 

140
00:09:37,270 --> 00:09:40,310
something that comes up differently and 
is treated differently in different 

141
00:09:40,310 --> 00:09:46,750
cultures. 
part of the goal of a first level class, 

142
00:09:46,750 --> 00:09:51,490
a freshmen class higher education is 
often, especially, when people from 

143
00:09:51,490 --> 00:09:55,450
different cultures come together is often 
educating about plagiarism rather than 

144
00:09:55,450 --> 00:10:01,290
just detecting, detecting and punishing. 
We're here in this class to teach people 

145
00:10:01,290 --> 00:10:06,010
about plagiarism, who may not have any 
sense what plagiarism is. 

146
00:10:06,010 --> 00:10:07,645
They may not have been taught anywhere 
else. 

147
00:10:07,645 --> 00:10:16,160
So if you detect plagiarism, please do 
you not attack the person, please do not 

148
00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:20,960
tell them that plagiarism is the most 
horrible academic offense. 

149
00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:25,080
If you see plagiarism, think of that as 
an educational, an opportunity for you to 

150
00:10:25,080 --> 00:10:28,360
teach somebody. 
Say, oh, I see you took this. 

151
00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:31,810
Please, this is plagiarism, you're not 
supposed to do it, you should either 

152
00:10:31,810 --> 00:10:35,100
rewrite this or indicate that it's a 
quote, okay? 

153
00:10:35,100 --> 00:10:38,970
When you're turning in an essay, 
everything that you write should be your 

154
00:10:38,970 --> 00:10:42,000
own words. 
Unless it's a quote and then you should 

155
00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:44,860
indicate it's a quote. 
So here's here's a little example of 

156
00:10:44,860 --> 00:10:48,450
something that I wrote. 
So this might be something, a question 

157
00:10:48,450 --> 00:10:52,390
about something like who is the most 
important person in the history of the 

158
00:10:52,390 --> 00:10:54,860
internet? 
Or who is your favorite person in the 

159
00:10:54,860 --> 00:10:57,390
history of the internet? 
Maybe that's the question, and so here 

160
00:10:57,390 --> 00:11:01,830
I've started to write at the top. 
You know what, I say I think Vint Cerf is 

161
00:11:01,830 --> 00:11:05,690
an important figure. 
And then I go, and I copy and paste 

162
00:11:05,690 --> 00:11:09,140
directly from Wikipedia. 
In the early days Vint Cerf was a program 

163
00:11:09,140 --> 00:11:11,790
manager for blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, 
blah, blah. 

164
00:11:11,790 --> 00:11:15,940
And then, I sort of switch back into my 
own voice, and I just kind of decide as 

165
00:11:15,940 --> 00:11:20,520
I'm reading Wikipedia to help me write. 
And I just grab this little sentence from 

166
00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:23,652
Wikipedia. 
Now when I'm grading, it's interesting, 

167
00:11:23,652 --> 00:11:30,090
it's very easy to sort of catch the 
change of voice from something you're 

168
00:11:30,090 --> 00:11:34,720
writing very easy in narrative flow and 
something like Wikipedia where they're 

169
00:11:34,720 --> 00:11:40,220
writing in a more formal style. 
And so, it's like, in the early days, 

170
00:11:40,220 --> 00:11:44,184
well that, for me, I can just look at 
that, I don't even have to look at 

171
00:11:44,184 --> 00:11:45,620
Wikipedia. 
I can go like, hmm, this writer probably 

172
00:11:45,620 --> 00:11:47,220
wouldn't use the phrase 'in the early 
days. 

173
00:11:47,220 --> 00:11:50,920
And so I have this little [SOUND] little 
bell go off. 

174
00:11:50,920 --> 00:11:54,220
I don't look for plagiarism, but it's not 
hard to find, okay? 

175
00:11:54,220 --> 00:11:57,630
Because you see a change in writing 
style. 

176
00:11:57,630 --> 00:12:01,845
Now if, for example, you really felt that 
this statement was gloriously expressed 

177
00:12:01,845 --> 00:12:06,340
in Wikipedia and you could do no better, 
you can put it in your document, you just 

178
00:12:06,340 --> 00:12:09,210
have to put it in properly. 
You have to reference it. 

179
00:12:09,210 --> 00:12:13,160
So I say, you know, I think Vint Cert is 
an important figure, according to 

180
00:12:13,160 --> 00:12:14,840
Wikipedia, and then I put a little 
reference mark in here. 

181
00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:18,330
And then, I simply cut and paste the text 
from Wikipedia. 

182
00:12:18,330 --> 00:12:23,110
I put it in double quotes, I make it 
italics, and then I put at the bottom, I 

183
00:12:23,110 --> 00:12:26,260
put a little reference. 
This is not plagiarism. 

184
00:12:26,260 --> 00:12:30,140
I cut and pasted it literally from 
Wikipedia, right into my paper. 

185
00:12:30,140 --> 00:12:33,900
But I'm honest about it. 
I'm pointing out what part I wrote. 

186
00:12:33,900 --> 00:12:37,280
What part I didn't write. 
What I said in the previous slide is when 

187
00:12:37,280 --> 00:12:40,970
you're putting something in, unless you 
indicate otherwise, you are representing 

188
00:12:40,970 --> 00:12:44,820
it as your own writing, your own creative 
expression. 

189
00:12:44,820 --> 00:12:46,720
Okay? 
And that's the key to plagiarism. 

190
00:12:46,720 --> 00:12:52,110
It's not that you don't put this in, it's 
you don't put it in, you don't put it in 

191
00:12:52,110 --> 00:12:56,395
and then hide it or not acknowledge it. 
Alright, in the second example, I'm 

192
00:12:56,395 --> 00:12:59,590
acknowledging what I'm using. 
Now, I may want to rewrite it. 

193
00:12:59,590 --> 00:13:01,860
And that's okay, and you don't have to 
rewrite it. 

194
00:13:01,860 --> 00:13:05,870
You might even put, like, a little, if 
you take this and reword it quite nicely 

195
00:13:05,870 --> 00:13:10,200
to be your own words, you might still put 
a footnote in to say, as I wrote these 

196
00:13:10,200 --> 00:13:14,310
words, I was inspired by the, what I 
wrote, read on Wikipedia. 

197
00:13:14,310 --> 00:13:17,400
Oh, and by the way, I like Wikipedia, 
okay? 

198
00:13:17,400 --> 00:13:20,230
Some teachers will tell you that oh, 
Wikipedia's terrible. 

199
00:13:20,230 --> 00:13:24,080
Especially for technical things, 
Wikipedia is probably the best reference 

200
00:13:24,080 --> 00:13:27,940
in the world, the Encyclopedia 
Britannica, or even a textbook is often 

201
00:13:27,940 --> 00:13:32,940
not as, quite as good as Wikipedia on 
something like who Vint Cerf is. 

202
00:13:32,940 --> 00:13:36,260
Right? 
So, don't get all upset if people start 

203
00:13:36,260 --> 00:13:38,465
using Wikipedia. 
I actually encourage it. 

204
00:13:38,465 --> 00:13:41,715
I encourage you to use Wikipedia to help 
form your thoughts quickly and if 

205
00:13:41,715 --> 00:13:46,040
Wikipedia is something that you want to 
reference, far as I'm concerned it's 

206
00:13:46,040 --> 00:13:49,130
great. 
And that's different teachers may think 

207
00:13:49,130 --> 00:13:52,080
differently about that. 
They may be teaching different things. 

208
00:13:52,080 --> 00:13:56,960
I'm teaching a topic for which Wikipedia 
is often an excellent source. 

209
00:13:56,960 --> 00:14:00,990
Maybe not the only source, maybe use 
Wikipedia to learn other things that's 

210
00:14:00,990 --> 00:14:03,970
all cool but, I'm not anti-Wikipedia in 
this course. 

211
00:14:05,190 --> 00:14:10,060
So again, don't spend a lot of time like, 
staring for plagiarism, looking at every 

212
00:14:10,060 --> 00:14:13,190
word trying to find it. 
I find they often jump out at me as I 

213
00:14:13,190 --> 00:14:15,785
just in reading as I've been doing it for 
a long time. 

214
00:14:15,785 --> 00:14:20,140
You know, take points off as you see. 
If you want to put the points all the way 

215
00:14:20,140 --> 00:14:23,919
down to zero, if somebody just answered, 
I asked that question about Vince Surf, 

216
00:14:23,919 --> 00:14:27,580
and they just took the first four 
paragraphs from Wikipedia and they put 

217
00:14:27,580 --> 00:14:30,830
those right in, and that's their whole 
essay with no acknowledgments or 

218
00:14:30,830 --> 00:14:33,570
anything, give them zero. 
Right? 

219
00:14:33,570 --> 00:14:37,860
And just say, it appears as though the 
first, all your paragraphs came straight 

220
00:14:37,860 --> 00:14:40,100
from Wikipedia. 
This is plagiarism. 

221
00:14:40,100 --> 00:14:42,720
You did not reference it. 
You did not indicate that it came from 

222
00:14:42,720 --> 00:14:45,442
another source, so that’s plagiarism and 
so I gave you zero points. 

223
00:14:45,442 --> 00:14:48,982
Don’t say, and you’re evil. 
Right. 

224
00:14:48,982 --> 00:14:52,920
Don’t be cruel. 
I mean, again, not everybody sees 

225
00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:56,060
plagiarism the same way, especially when 
we’re bringing people from so many 

226
00:14:56,060 --> 00:14:59,670
cultures together. 
So don't add comments about your views on 

227
00:14:59,670 --> 00:15:02,660
plagiarism. 
Don't make value judgements about some 

228
00:15:02,660 --> 00:15:05,440
person being horrible because they did 
it. 

229
00:15:05,440 --> 00:15:08,625
We are here to learn. 
And even in cases of plagiarism, our 

230
00:15:08,625 --> 00:15:15,380
primary goal is to learn. 
So, generally, I have a coupe of rubrics 

231
00:15:15,380 --> 00:15:18,740
that I ask you to rate them on. 
You don't have to grade these things 

232
00:15:18,740 --> 00:15:21,680
particularly harshly. 
I'm curious if it was interesting to 

233
00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:25,180
read. 
That kind of, did this person write for 

234
00:15:25,180 --> 00:15:26,680
the audience? 
You're the audience. 

235
00:15:26,680 --> 00:15:29,300
Did you read it? 
Did you think that it was worth your time 

236
00:15:29,300 --> 00:15:32,530
reading? 
Is the answer on topic? 

237
00:15:32,530 --> 00:15:36,440
Sometimes people will completely ignore 
the question and answer something 

238
00:15:36,440 --> 00:15:39,260
completely different. 
If they misunderstand the question, or 

239
00:15:39,260 --> 00:15:42,560
whatever. 
So you get a chance to give points as to 

240
00:15:42,560 --> 00:15:46,318
whether or not the question was answered. 
And for the more technical ones, you 

241
00:15:46,318 --> 00:15:50,640
know, the, we, you know, did the person 
dig in a little bit? 

242
00:15:50,640 --> 00:15:55,240
Are there, or did they just state the 
obvious or kind of gently rephrase 

243
00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:58,980
exactly what was said in lecture? 
Did they, did they add something beyond 

244
00:15:58,980 --> 00:16:02,710
the obvious? 
you know, do they have, do they make 

245
00:16:02,710 --> 00:16:06,610
arguments without supporting them? 
Or do they, if there is any kind of 

246
00:16:06,610 --> 00:16:09,950
argument or statement that that might be 
questioned. 

247
00:16:09,950 --> 00:16:14,520
Do they use references to support them? 
And so, not all questions that I ask will 

248
00:16:14,520 --> 00:16:18,020
have the same rubric. 
Some, some have fewer rubrics, some have 

249
00:16:18,020 --> 00:16:20,700
more rubrics. 
But this is the basic things I'm going to 

250
00:16:20,700 --> 00:16:24,490
ask you to rate points. 
And you'll put like, oh okay, this is 

251
00:16:24,490 --> 00:16:27,880
this is like 6 points, and this is 2 
points, and this is 2 points. 

252
00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:30,850
Well, okay so this is 4 points, 2 points, 
2 points. 

253
00:16:30,850 --> 00:16:34,680
And that adds up to 10 points. 
And you get to, to put a little ranking 

254
00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:36,200
on them. 
And that's how you'll be grading, so 

255
00:16:36,200 --> 00:16:41,226
I'll, I'll do some guided grading for 
you, to get you, to help you. 

256
00:16:41,226 --> 00:16:46,362
So when the peer grading is done your 
grade, the grade that you get for the 

257
00:16:46,362 --> 00:16:50,370
assignment effectively drops the high and 
low grades. 

258
00:16:50,370 --> 00:16:53,160
It's not the average. 
it's the median. 

259
00:16:53,160 --> 00:16:55,050
Right? 
So it's something in the middle. 

260
00:16:55,050 --> 00:17:00,410
The, the, the, the hopefully they're all 
clustered together and they're all pretty 

261
00:17:00,410 --> 00:17:03,710
consistent. 
The survey research says that, you know, 

262
00:17:03,710 --> 00:17:07,450
if you have five people do peer grading, 
you kind of throw out the top and the 

263
00:17:07,450 --> 00:17:10,450
bottom. 
And something in the middle is, is, is 

264
00:17:10,450 --> 00:17:14,350
very close to what the teacher would have 
ultimately graded the assignment. 

265
00:17:14,350 --> 00:17:17,160
And so it's, it's a median, high and low 
scores are dropped. 

266
00:17:19,930 --> 00:17:21,695
What I really want is I want you to 
relax. 

267
00:17:21,695 --> 00:17:24,578
I want you to do these things, I want you 
to learn from it. 

268
00:17:24,578 --> 00:17:27,740
If you're not an English speaker they, 
they can be a little intimidating. 

269
00:17:27,740 --> 00:17:30,990
And I want you to give them a try and I 
want you to see how it goes. 

270
00:17:30,990 --> 00:17:35,750
And if it doesn't feel good to you, then 
yeah, go ahead and and, and, you know, 

271
00:17:35,750 --> 00:17:38,145
don't do any more. 
But they're extra credit, you know? 

272
00:17:38,145 --> 00:17:42,810
you just have to get used to when you 
look at the comments that come back from 

273
00:17:42,810 --> 00:17:45,810
other students. 
Some of them are just going to be dumb. 

274
00:17:45,810 --> 00:17:49,010
I mean some are going to be bad and 
they'll just be wrong or they'll be 

275
00:17:49,010 --> 00:17:51,200
critical. 
You gotta ignore those. 

276
00:17:51,200 --> 00:17:55,350
Look for those things in the feedback 
that you get from the other students that 

277
00:17:55,350 --> 00:17:59,270
help you learn, that help you become a 
better writer. 

278
00:17:59,270 --> 00:18:02,730
Remember part of my goal across these 
three assignments is not just the 

279
00:18:02,730 --> 00:18:05,800
material in this class. 
But if you're to take other Coursera 

280
00:18:05,800 --> 00:18:10,720
classes, I want you to be skilled at peer 
[INAUDIBLE], writing for your peers and 

281
00:18:10,720 --> 00:18:13,820
grading your peers. 
So part of this is just practice, in case 

282
00:18:13,820 --> 00:18:16,040
you're going to take other classes that 
require peer grading. 

283
00:18:16,040 --> 00:18:19,905
And so, look at the comments that are 
useful to you, and ignore the bad ones. 

284
00:18:19,905 --> 00:18:24,810
And, you know, you, you will feel bad 
when you see a grader who's, who said 

285
00:18:24,810 --> 00:18:29,145
something very critical about your work. 
We're not going to and punish bad 

286
00:18:29,145 --> 00:18:33,310
graders. 
[COUGH] We're not going to regrade. 

287
00:18:33,310 --> 00:18:36,270
That's why these things are all extra 
credit. 

288
00:18:36,270 --> 00:18:39,850
If you get a 6 out of a 10, that's 6 
extra points. 

289
00:18:39,850 --> 00:18:43,680
You shouldn't, I mean we all think that 
if we don't get anything other than a 10 

290
00:18:43,680 --> 00:18:48,360
out of a 10 we've somehow failed. 
This is a very imperfect process. 

291
00:18:48,360 --> 00:18:51,980
We're going to learn from the process and 
that's why I made all of the credits 

292
00:18:51,980 --> 00:18:56,460
extra credit, right? 
Again, this isn't just for this class. 

293
00:18:56,460 --> 00:19:01,760
I want to get us used to as a community, 
as a Coursera community, on how to do 

294
00:19:01,760 --> 00:19:05,310
this in general. 
So, let's focus on enjoying this, 

295
00:19:06,450 --> 00:19:09,460
learning this, and not getting too 
serious. 

296
00:19:09,460 --> 00:19:13,070
So I hope to see some of your writing in 
the peer graded assignments in the 

297
00:19:13,070 --> 00:19:14,100
course. 
Thanks. 

