Question 1
Which of the following accurately summarizes Knudson’s 2-hit hypothesis?
Question 2
Which of the following tests would be an example of a primarily pharmacogenomic approach to cancer?
Question 3
Currently, what is the clinical value of identifying somatic mutations in cancer?
Question 4
Mutations in a given tumor suppressor or oncogene always result in the same type (i.e. prostate, colon, etc.) of cancer.
Question 5
A young woman develops breast cancer and is found to carry a mutation in BRCA1. Her geneticist explains that hers is known to be a common mutation. The woman is surprised because her parents and grandparents are healthy, and no one in her family has ever had breast cancer before. Which of the following is the LEAST likely explanation for this lack of a family history?
Question 6
Which of the following accurately describes the role of epigenetics in cancer?
Question 7
What is a role of proto-oncogenes in a normal cell?
Question 8
A 31-year-old woman comes to you and explains that her 33-year-old sister was just diagnosed with “triple-negative” breast cancer. She is concerned that there may be a hereditary cancer syndrome in her family, and requests genetic testing. What would be the most appropriate response?
Question 9
You decide to order genetic testing on your patient, consisting of full sequence analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The result is normal. What would be appropriate counseling for your patient?
Question 10
Your patient returns to you and informs you that her sister with cancer has now undergone genetic testing, which showed a deletion of several exons in one copy of BRCA1. What is the appropriate next step?
Question 11
The following question is an opinion question to help encourage discussion on genetic testing and will not affect your grade.
As you have learned in this course, genetic testing from fetuses to newborns to adults is moving at a rapid pace with tremendous possibilities to affect patient care. At the same time, these sophisticated tests are often quite expensive. Regulators, insurers, governments, doctors, and patients are all struggling with issues surrounding how to pay for tests, which tests, and in what circumstances. We would like your opinion.
Now that you have a sense of the genetic tests that are available and what they can and cannot offer, which of the following best represents how you would address the issue of paying for genetic testing? By “genetic test” we mean any test discussed in the course you have just completed except direct-to-consumer tests. We recognize that the list of options below cannot be exhaustive, and we ask that you select the option that is closest to your opinion.
A person has a right to any genetic test that their doctor feels might be useful in their care, and such testing should always be covered by all insurers. Testing should never be rationed by any criteria.
A person has a right to genetic tests that will lead to a treatment, diagnosis, more accurate prognosis, or informed reproductive decision making. Tests that fulfill one of these criteria should be covered. The ordering physician decides if the test meets one of these criteria. In other words, testing is rationed by the physician based on medical indication.
A person has a right to genetic tests that will lead to a treatment, diagnosis, more accurate prognosis, or informed reproductive decision making. Tests that fulfill one of these criteria should be covered. The insurer decides if the test meets one of these criteria. In other words, testing is rationed by the insurer based on medical indication.
A person has a right to genetic tests that will lead to a treatment only. Other tests are essentially “informational” and need not be covered, though a person can pay out-of-pocket. In other words, testing is rationed very strictly based on potential to treat disease only.
A person has a right to genetic tests that have previously been shown in clinical trials to lead to better outcomes. The opinion of a physician that a test will be beneficial without clinical evidence is insufficient to justify the cost. In other words, the test is rationed by a specific criterion: clinical trial data.
A third party (for example, a government agency or a special commission) should determine which genetic tests are covered by insurance, not the physician or the insurer. In other words, tests are rationed by someone other than the physician or the insurer.
Insurers should cover genetic testing ordered by physicians, but the physician must cap total yearly spending on genetic testing. In other words, testing is rationed by the physician based on total cost.
Insurers should cover genetic testing ordered by physicians, but the insurer can cap total yearly spending on genetic testing. In other words, testing is rationed by the insurer based on total cost.
A person does not have a right to undergo any genetic tests. Insurers can decide if tests are included as a benefit or not. The free market will determine how patients value access to genetic testing versus cost of insurance premiums.
Genetic testing is fundamentally different than traditional medical care, and insurers should not be responsible for providing coverage for genetic tests, and thus all genetic tests should be paid for out-of-pocket.