Week 3 Quiz Help Center

Learn more

Warning: The hard deadline has passed. You can attempt it, but you will not get credit for it. You are welcome to try it as a learning exercise.

Question 1

A “variant” detected by next-generation sequencing is:

Question 2

Current next-generation sequencing technology is most likely to detect a disease-causing variant caused by:

Question 3

What does “depth of coverage” refer to:

Question 4

The success rate for using whole genome/exome sequencing for solving diagnostic dilemmas is close to 100%.

Question 5

Which of the following type of variant is most likely to be damaging:

Question 6

Which of the following is generally NOT used as a criterion for estimating the likelihood that a variant detected by next-generation sequencing is pathogenic?

Question 7

Which of the following would be an appropriate component of pre-test counseling before ordering whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing for a patient?

Question 8

What is the added value of sequencing the unaffected parents when trying to find variants for an undiagnosed disease in a patient?

Question 9

The following is an opinion question to encourage discussion and thought on the intersection of ethics and genetics. There is no single correct answer, and you will receive credit for selecting any answer.

You work for an organization that provides whole-exome sequencing analysis and interpretation. A variant classified as a “variant of unknown significance" in TP53 (often referred to as p53) was detected in a child and his 19-year-old father who underwent testing for an unrelated suspected genetic syndrome. Because the significance was unknown, this variant was not reported. Five years later, a paper is published describing this precise variant as causative of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a disorder with high risk of several types of cancer for which aggressive screening is recommended. The physician who ordered the test retired four years ago and is no longer in contact with the family, and the family’s address provided on the initial test is also no longer up-to-date. Which option most closely reflects your opinion as to the organization’s obligation to locate the family and alert them to their high risk for cancer and recommended screening precautions?

Question 10

The following is an opinion question to encourage discussion and thought on the intersection of ethics and genetics. There is no single correct answer, and you will receive credit for selecting any answer.

Whole-genome sequencing on a newborn with a suspected genetic disorder, his 15-year-old mother, and her 16-year-old boyfriend is undertaken. The test reveals that the boyfriend is not the father, but the child has extensive regions of homozygosity, strongly suggesting consanguinity. Given the age of the mother, the testing organization is concerned that it has uncovered evidence of rape and/or incest, and is unsure of how to proceed. Which option is closest to how you might proceed?
    
You cannot submit your work until you agree to the Honor Code. Thanks!